撐起香港嗰代人,一個一個咁走
每一個訃聞,都係一份公開檔案閂咗門。而你屋企嗰份,從來未開過。
呢兩年嘅名單,長到唔想數落去。
二〇二三年十二月,周海媚離世,五十七歲。二〇二四年三月,黎明詩,五十八歲。二〇二五年七月,雪妮同周驄先後離世,周驄九十二歲。同年十月,許紹雄,七十六歲;月尾馮淬帆,八十歲。十一月,林尚武,七十五歲。二〇二六年七月,謝賢,八十九歲。
每一次,社交媒體上面都係同一個畫面:一堆劇照截圖,一堆「一個時代嘅終結」。三日之後又靜返。
但係佢哋其實留低咗好多
謝賢做咗超過七十年戲。周驄一九五五年入行,拍過超過八十五部電影。呢啲人一世人被人影住、錄住、訪問住。
所以佢哋走咗之後,我哋照樣睇得返、聽得返。一個時代嘅樣、聲、講嘢節奏,因為佢哋做嗰行,順手咁留咗低。
嚴格嚟講,佢哋唔算真係完全走咗。走嘅係人,唔係紀錄。
而同一代嘅幾百萬個普通人,冇
同一個年代嘅香港人,一樣捱過五六十年代,一樣住過木屋、做過工廠、供過樓、湊大一堆仔女。
分別淨係一樣:一批人入咗鏡,其餘幾百萬人冇。
所以每次有位老藝人走,我哋會攞返啲片出嚟睇;每次屋企有位老人家走,我哋攞得出嘅,係幾張相同幾條「食咗飯未」嘅語音。
「做過最叻嘅一件事,唔係捱過幾多辛苦,而係做咗你哋嘅媽媽。」
呢句唔係名人講嘅。留唔留得低,從來唔係睇個人有幾出名,係睇有冇人問過,同埋有冇人按過錄音掣。
「一個時代嘅終結」其實講緊乜
我哋講呢句嘅時候,講嘅唔止係一個藝人。係嗰種講嘢方式、嗰種語氣、嗰種而家冇人再咁樣做人嘅樣。
而呢啲嘢,你屋企個長輩身上一樣有。佢一樣係嗰個時代嘅人,一樣講緊嗰個年代嘅廣東話,一樣記得嗰陣啲嘢點解係咁。
分別淨係,冇人幫佢錄。
名人有片廠,你屋企得你一個
謝賢把聲留得低,係因為有成個電影工業替佢錄咗七十年。你阿爸阿媽把聲留唔留得低,就淨係得你一個人可以決定。
呢種新聞每隔幾個月就會嚟一次。下次見到嗰陣,如果你又有嗰種「係喎,我都想問下我阿媽」嘅感覺,唔使做大工程。
嗰晚問佢一條問題,錄低佢答。呢個就係開始。
The Generation That Made Hong Kong Is Leaving, One at a Time
Each obituary closes a public archive. The one in your own family was never opened.
The list from the past two years is longer than anyone wants to read.
December 2023, Kathy Chow, 57. March 2024, Stephanie Lai, 58. July 2025, Suet Nei, and days later Chow Chung at 92. October 2025, Benz Hui at 76, and at the end of that month Stanley Fung at 80. November, Lam Sheung Mo at 75. July 2026, Patrick Tse at 89.
Each time, social media does the same thing: a wall of screen grabs and a wave of posts about the end of an era. Three days later it goes quiet again.
But a great deal of them remains
Patrick Tse acted for over seventy years. Chow Chung started in 1955 and appeared in more than eighty-five films. These were people who spent their whole lives being filmed, recorded and interviewed.
So after they go we can still watch and still listen. The face, the voice and the speech rhythm of an era were preserved as a by-product of the job.
In a strict sense they have not entirely gone. The person has. The record has not.
The several million ordinary people of the same generation have nothing
Hong Kongers of exactly that era also came through the fifties and sixties, also lived in squatter huts, worked the factories, paid off a flat and raised a houseful of children.
The only difference is that some of them were on camera and several million were not.
So when a veteran actor dies we pull up the films. When someone's grandmother dies, what the family can pull up is a few photographs and some voice notes asking whether they have eaten.
"The one thing I did best in this life wasn't surviving all that hardship. It was becoming your mother."
Not said by anyone famous. What survives has never depended on how well known someone was. It depends on whether anyone asked, and whether anyone pressed record.
What "the end of an era" is actually describing
When we say it, we do not only mean one performer. We mean a way of speaking, a register, a way of carrying yourself that nobody has any more.
Your own elderly relative has all of that too. They are from the same era, speaking the same period Cantonese, still remembering why things were done the way they were.
The only difference is that nobody is recording them.
The famous had studios. Your family has you.
Patrick Tse's voice survives because a film industry spent seventy years recording it. Whether your parents' voices survive is a decision exactly one person gets to make.
This kind of news arrives every few months. Next time it does, and you get that flicker of I really should ask my mother about that, it does not have to become a project.
Ask her one question that evening and record the answer. That is the whole beginning.
傾一傾,唔使即刻決定Let's talk. No decision needed today.
WhatsApp 我哋WhatsApp Us